A/HRC/43/53/Add.2
approximately 16 million tons of carbon dioxide had been injected. Studies show no
evidence of leakage.21
44.
Norway is considering a major multibillion-dollar carbon capture and storage pilot
project involving either the cement industry or a waste incineration facility, with an
investment decision anticipated in 2020 or 2021. If successful at a reasonable cost, which is
a major challenge, such a project could set an important precedent globally and open the
door for exporting Norwegian technology in this field.
International climate and forest initiative
45.
The Norwegian International Climate and Forest Initiative has an annual budget of
up to 3 billion Norwegian krone (approximately $350 million) to reduce deforestation and
forest degradation in developing countries, while improving the livelihoods of people living
in or near these forests. 22 The initiative is led by the Ministry of Climate and Environment
and the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation. Deforestation and forest
degradation not only contribute to climate change, but also cause the loss of biodiversity
and jeopardize the human rights of people who depend on healthy forests.
46.
The Norwegian International Climate and Forest Initiative has an explicit
commitment to advancing the rights of indigenous peoples and forest-dependent
communities, which is a crucial element in empowering them to become effective forest
stewards. Since 2016, gender equality is also explicitly addressed in projects under the
Initiative. After 10 years of experience, Norway commissioned several evaluations of the
Initiative and is implementing recommendations from those evaluations, such as focusing
future efforts on tropical forests and in countries where progress is being made.23 In the
context of efforts to protect forests, several civil society organizations raised concerns about
the human rights and environmental consequences of high levels of Norwegian imports of
Brazilian soy to provide feed for aquaculture, cattle and dairy.
C.
Clean air
47.
While clean water is now globally recognized as a fundamental human right, this is
not yet the case for clean air, despite the fact that air pollution kills millions of people
annually, including hundreds of thousands of children under the age of 5. Clean air is one
of the basic elements of the right to live in a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable
environment (A/HRC/40/55, paras. 17 and 44–50).
48.
In general, Norway has very good air quality. As recently as a few years ago, this
was not the case. In 2015, a legal action was brought against Norway by the EFTA
Surveillance Authority for failure to comply with air pollution limits established by the
European Union. 24 The EFTA Court of Justice concluded that Norway had repeatedly
exceeded limits for particulate matter, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide between 2008
and 2012, thus violating the European Union air quality law. 25
49.
Today, all Norwegian cities listed in the World Health Organization (WHO) Global
Ambient Air Quality Database have annual levels of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) – the
main pollutant implicated in causing respiratory illness, cardiovascular disease, stroke and
lung cancer – at or below the WHO guideline (annual mean of 10 micrograms per cubic
21
22
23
24
25
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, “Sleipner Fact Sheet: Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage
Project”, 30 September 2016.
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, “Norway’s International Climate and Forest
Initiative”. Available at https://norad.no/en/front/thematic-areas/climate-change-andenvironment/norways-international-climate-and-forest-initiative-nicfi/.
Warren Olding, Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative: Lessons Learned and
Recommendations, synthesis report (Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, October
2017).
Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air
quality and cleaner air for Europe (Air Quality Directive).
EFTA Court of Justice, EFTA Surveillance Officer v. Norway, Case E-7/15, judgment, 2 October
2015.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents