A/HRC/29/14 Introduction 1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, established in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1 of 18 June 2007, held its twenty-first session from 19 to 30 January 2015. The review of Grenada was held at the 12th meeting on 26 January 2015. The delegation of Grenada was headed by Robert Branch, Senior Legal Counsel, Attorney General’s Chambers. At its 17th meeting held on 29 January 2015, the Working Group adopted the report on Grenada. 2. On 13 January 2015, the Human Rights Council selected the following group of rapporteurs (troika) to facilitate the review of Grenada: Japan, Mexico and the United States of America. 3. In accordance with paragraph 15 of the annex to resolution 5/1 and paragraph 5 of the annex to resolution 16/21, the following documents were issued for the review of Grenada: (a) A national report submitted/written presentation made in accordance with paragraph 15 (a) (A/HRC/WG.6/21/GRD/1); (b) A compilation prepared by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in accordance with paragraph 15 (b) (A/HRC/WG.6/21/GRD/2); (c) A summary prepared by OHCHR in accordance with paragraph 15 (c) (A/HRC/WG.6/21/GRD/3). 4. A list of questions prepared in advance by Germany, Mexico, Slovenia, Spain and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland was transmitted to Grenada through the troika. Those questions are available on the extranet of the universal periodic review (UPR). A summary of additional questions posed by Canada, France, Jamaica, Montenegro, Panama, Paraguay and the Philippines during the interactive dialogue is to be found in section I B of the present report. I. Summary of the proceedings of the review process A. Presentation by the State under review 5. The head of the delegation was pleased to present the report of Grenada to the second universal periodic review and to give an account of the status of the implementation of recommendations made during its first review in 2010. Grenada reiterated its commitment to human rights and pledged to continue supporting the strengthening of the human rights mechanisms. 6. The delegation apologized for the delay in submitting the national report, a challenge faced by small countries. The report had been prepared in consultation with a number of stakeholders and civil society organizations, including the Grenada Human Rights Organization, and described progress made since the first review in 2010, regarding the fulfilment of its human rights commitments and international obligations. 7. The delegation thanked delegations that had sent questions in advance. While Grenada had not accepted all of the recommendations made during the first review, it continued efforts to achieve the commitments made in 2010. 3