A/HRC/26/41 (xi) Encouraging donor countries to tailor their programmes, at least in part, towards addressing specific universal periodic review recommendations; (xii) Developing a specific inter-committee follow-up mechanism for all the treaty bodies, for example by utilizing an existing body; (xiii) Shifting from the current voluntary opt-in funding system for the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance and the Universal Periodic Review Voluntary Trust Fund to an equally voluntary but more structured and effective opt-out system; (xiv) Focusing much more than has been the case on in-kind contributions of human resources and technological inputs to the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance and the Universal Periodic Review Voluntary Trust Fund; (xv) Broadening the donor base of the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance and the Universal Periodic Review Voluntary Trust Fund to include many more non-traditional donors; (xvi) Broadening access to the Voluntary Trust Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance to some degree in order to support not only States and regional groups, but also a wider range of stakeholders, such as national human rights institutions and local civil society groups; (h) There is also a need to enhance the practical steps already being taken by OHCHR towards the mainstreaming of human rights across the global institutional system by encouraging the establishment of intra-institutional focal points, where they do not already exist, in all the relevant trade, migration, intellectual property, security and development organizations, and by setting up a similar office in the Human Rights Council as appropriate. 18