A/HRC/16/48 Number of cases on which the Government has replied Multiple replies on some cases Number of cases of possible clarification by Government (6-month rule) 72 16 No Urgent appeal N/A Government response N/A General allegation N/A Government response N/A Prompt intervention letter Yes Government response No Working Group request for a visit Yes Government response None Urgent actions 215. The Working Group sent one case to the Government under its urgent action procedure. The case concerned Mr. Kokulo Singh Leimakhujam, who was allegedly abducted on 3 August 2010, at a checkpoint in Patsoi Lai Umang, Manipur, by Indian Army officials of the Maratha Light Infantry. Information from the Government 216. The Government transmitted twelve communications to the Working Group. 217. On 28 December 2009, the Government replied to a general allegation sent on 22 July 2009, as reported below. 218. On 7 April 2010, the Government replied to 13 cases. It requested more information on 8 and provided information on the remaining cases. The information included was not considered sufficient to clarify them. 219. On 8 April 2010, the Government transmitted information on 64 outstanding cases. Based on this information, the Working Group decided at its ninety-first session to apply the six-month rule to 15 of them. For the remaining cases, the information was considered insufficient to clarify them. In the same communication, the Government requested more information on two cases. 220. On 28 April 2010, the Government transmitted information on one outstanding case. On the basis of this information, the Working Group decided at its ninety-first session to apply the six-month rule. 221. On 27 May 2010, the Government transmitted two communications with information on one case and five outstanding cases respectively. The information included in both communications was considered insufficient to clarify them. 222. On 3 June 2010, the Government transmitted information on one outstanding case that was considered insufficient to clarify it. 223. On 24 June 2010, the Government transmitted information on one outstanding case that was considered insufficient to clarify it. 224. On 9 August 2010, the Government commented on the general comment on enforced disappearance as a crime against humanity issued by the Working Group in 2009. 225. On 16 August 2010, the Government requested clarification on the decision adopted by the Working Group at its ninety-first session concerning nine cases and wanted to know whether copies of death certificates concerning those cases would be of assistance to the Working Group. 57