A/HRC/36/58 150. The Comité français pour la solidarité internationale and the Programme on Women’s Economic, Social and Cultural Rights suggested adding a paragraph on prohibiting the authorization of involuntary displacement in the name of development. 151. Several representatives of civil society organizations stressed the need for free legal aid and proposed language to that effect. D. 1. Articles 13-16 Article 13 152. The European Union suggested reformulating the title of the article to reflect the wording of article 6 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. ILO recommended that the title refer to “decent work” and proposed specific wording for an additional paragraph on child labour. 153. The Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales suggested adding “seasonal and migrant workers” to paragraph 1, for consistency. 154. While understanding the source of the language in paragraph 2, Guatemala expressed concern at the current formulation, which recommended how States ought to act to solve the problem. 155. Egypt proposed splitting paragraph 2 into two. The second part, starting “In States facing high levels of rural poverty”, would make reference to the importance of international cooperation. 156. The European Union proposed inserting “as appropriate” after “labour inspectorates” in paragraph 3. 157. ILO suggested adding language on forced labour, consistent with international standards, to paragraph 4. Specifically, it suggested adding “to be a victim of human trafficking or to be held in any form of contemporary slavery” at the end of the first sentence. In the second sentence, a reference to “all forms of contemporary slavery” would be more appropriate than the reference to “economic exploitation”. 158. On an additional paragraph on child labour, Mr. Golay suggested referring to ILO conventions in the preamble and adding specific language to the body of the declaration. On the addition of a reference to “international cooperation” in paragraph 2, he said that other subparagraphs in the draft declaration addressed the issue in a general manner. 2. Article 14 159. The European Union suggested adding “as defined by national legislation” in the reference to migrant workers in paragraph 1. Ecuador stated that subjecting paragraph 1 to domestic law could be construed as denying the right to safety and health at work to those not legally working in a certain territory. Mr. Golay suggested that a solution could be to add language similar to that contained in article 46 (2) of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, on limitations to the exercise of rights. 160. ILO recommended that paragraph 1 elaborate more on measures to prevent, reduce and control hazards and risks. 161. The Programme on Women’s Economic, Social and Cultural Rights suggested inserting “sexual” before “harassment” in paragraph 1 and adding language to the effect that workers should not be placed at any disadvantage as a result of removing themselves from danger. It suggested referring to the provision of childcare facilities at the workplace and ensuring safe and affordable transportation to work. 162. In paragraph 2, ILO recommended that the latter part of the sentence, starting from “agrochemicals”, be replaced with “hazardous substances or toxic chemicals”. It also recommended that paragraph 3 start with a reference to the relevant ILO instruments and that details of appropriate measures be incorporated. 13