A/HRC/37/29
terror attacks on cultural sites, such as the attack on the Islamic Museum in 2014 and the
destruction of one of Egypt’s most historic churches in 2017.
45.
The representative of Ethiopia explained that the country had nine tangible and three
intangible cultural heritage sites listed in the UNESCO heritage lists. Ethiopia had been a
victim of plundering and looting of its heritage. A greater danger was the deliberate
destruction of heritage as part of the deculturalization process used by terrorist groups.
46.
The representative of Iraq recalled that the country had been the subject of terrorist
attacks that destroyed and pillaged historic sites, such as Jonah’s tomb, a number of
religious sites, churches, mosques and, more recently, the al-Nuri mosque and the al-Hadba
minaret. The representative of RASHID International welcomed the move by Iraq towards
acceding to the Second Protocol to The Hague Convention.
47.
The representative of Cyprus noted the country’s rich tradition of intangible cultural
heritage. In implementing the 2003 UNESCO Convention, the Government had adopted the
following measures: (a) compiling and publishing a first register of heritage elements in the
Cyprus Research Centre’s Oral Tradition Archive; (b) updating annually the National
Inventory of Intangible Cultural Heritage, with the involvement of concerned populations;
(c) launching a funding scheme to support activities to safeguard elements in the National
Inventory; (d) providing training to community members on the identification of their
intangible cultural heritage and the elaboration of safeguarding measures; and (e)
collaborating with other countries on the identification of common heritage elements for
nomination to the UNESCO Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of
Humanity.
48.
The representative of the National Human Rights Council of Morocco said that the
Council had drawn the attention of the national authorities to the destruction of prehistoric
and proto-historic sites, in particular engravings in the southern provinces, by construction
and road work companies. The Council had also underscored the risk of destruction of
intangible cultural heritage by discriminatory policies that ran counter to the history of
countries and their cultures. A representative of civil society mentioned that an indigenous
language, Tamazight, was being destroyed by fundamentalism.
IV. Conditions for meaningful engagement of rights holders
A.
Statements by panellists
49.
Mr. Mancisidor stressed that the destruction of cultural heritage was a human rights
violation, not merely the destruction of stones. He recalled general comment No. 21 (2009)
on the right of everyone to take part in cultural life of the Committee on Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights. Participation was part of the normative content of the right enshrined
in article 15 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. He
noted that participation meant to act in freedom, to have the ability to access heritage, but
also to construct, modify and interact with heritage.
50.
Mr. Mancisidor noted that the more a community felt that heritage was useful for its
life, identity and living conditions, the more willing it would be to protect it. In postconflict reconstruction, heritage must provide an opportunity to create, recreate and
reconstruct society and its identity, and to provide opportunities for employment and human
development. Article 15 of the Covenant referred to heritage that must be useful for human
development.
51.
He explained that those issues had been discussed with State delegations appearing
before the Committee and recommended that they be regularly addressed in the work of the
Human Rights Council, especially the universal periodic review, with a focus on protection,
participation, international cooperation, access, freedom, and the security of persons
working on heritage. Those elements constituted the normative content of the right to
participate in cultural life and were not merely political aspirations; therefore, they could,
and should, be addressed at the universal period review.
8
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents