A/HRC/32/48
92.
The Special Rapporteur draws attention to the fact that no progress has been made in
solving outstanding cases of the enforced disappearance of political opponents of the
President. These cases, which although dating back to 1999 and 2000 (see A/HRC/29/43,
para. 66) are still unsolved, concern the testified abduction of prominent Belarusian
opposition politician Viktar Hanchar and his business associate Anatol Krasouski, of Yury
Zakharanka, the former Minister of the Interior, and Dmitri Zavadski, a cameraman. The
issue was raised again during the second universal periodic review of Belarus
(A/HRC/30/3, para. 129.5) amidst serious concerns with regard to the accountability of
former or current law enforcement members and on impunity that the police authorities
seem to enjoy.
93.
On 12 August 2015, police in Mikashevichy detained Leanid Dubanosau, who was
gathering signatures for presidential contender Tatsiana Karatkevich, on the grounds that he
was intoxicated. The activist was forced to undergo a medical examination, which showed
that he was sober at the time.13
94.
On 9 September 2015, police officers in Jeĺsk, Homieĺ region, detained Aliaksandr
Rybachenka, an activist for the European Belarus opposition movement, for trying to
photograph flyers calling for a boycott of the elections. The activist was held in the police
station for several hours, and eventually released without charge.14
95.
On 1 August 2015, police officers prevented the holding of a rock concert near
Minsk, and detained young people, including girls, using force and non-lethal weapons.
96.
On 6 November 2015, Tamara Siarhei, leader of the civil initiative “Against
lawlessness in the courts and Prosecutor’s offices”, who attempted to deliver a petition to
President Lukashenka, was detained at the central railway station in Minsk.15
97.
Arbitrary arrest and detention have been the subject of many recommendations of
various United Nations human rights mechanisms, for at least the past six years. For
example, the Committee on the Rights of the Child concluded that the authorities of Belarus
should investigate the complaints about arbitrary detention of women in the context of the
Presidential elections on 19 December 2010 (CRC/C/BLR/CO/3-4). Similarly, at the first
universal periodic review of Belarus, States called upon the Government of Belarus to
investigate, identify and punish perpetrators of harassment, arbitrary detention and torture
of government opponents (A/HRC/15/16, para. 98.23). During the second universal
periodic review of the State, the Working Group addressed the issue of the arbitrary
detention of journalists, and called upon the Government to abandon that practice (see
A/HRC/30/3, para. 129). In 2014, the Special Rapporteur recommended that all detainees
be informed promptly of the reason for their detention and any charges against them, and
that regular access to a lawyer of their choice and to their families be granted
(A/HRC/26/44, para. 139 (i)).
H.
Death penalty
98.
Belarus remains the only State in Europe to enforce the death penalty. The
authorities do not release information on the number of executions, which reportedly are
carried out by shooting. Prisoners and relatives are not informed when the execution is due,
and the relatives receive no prior notification. The bodies are not returned to relatives, but
13
14
15
16
Viasna Human Rights Center, “Collector of signatures for Tatsiana Karatkevich detained in
Mikaševičy”, 13 August 2015.
Viasna, “European Belarus activist detained in Jelsk”. 21 September 2015.
Viasna, “Human Rights Situation in Belarus: November 2015”, 2 December 2015.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents