A/HRC/39/20
Annex II
Engagement of national human rights institutions in the third
cycle of the universal periodic review (2017–2018)
Thirtieth session of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review (2018)
State (in order of review)
Written contribution for summary
(as used)a
Oral statement to Human Rights Council during the adoption
of the outcome of the universal periodic review of the country
concerned (A status national human rights institutions only)b
Germany
Yes (A status)
..
Colombia
Yes (A status)
..
Canada
Yes (A status)
..
Bangladesh
Yes (B status)
..
Russian Federation
Yes (A status)
..
Azerbaijan
..
Cameroon
..
Twenty-ninth session of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review (2018)
State (in order of review)
Written contribution for summary
(as used)a
Oral statement to Human Rights Council during the adoption
of the outcome of the universal periodic review of the country
concerned (A status national human rights institutions only) c
France
Yes (A status)
..
Mali
..
Burundi
..
Luxembourg
Yes (A status)
..
Montenegro
Yes (B status)
..
Serbia
Yes (A status)
..
Twenty-eighth session of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review (2017)
State (in order of review)
Written contribution for summary
(as used)a
Oral statement to Human Rights Council during the adoption
of the outcome of the universal periodic review of the country
concerned (A status national human rights institutions only)
Argentina
Yes (A status)
No statement made
Ghana
18
No statement made
Peru
Yes (A status)
No statement made
Guatemala
Yes (A status)
Agenda item 6 (thirty-seventh session of the
Human Rights Council)
Universal periodic review of Guatemala
Republic of Korea
Yes (A status)
Agenda item 6 (thirty-seventh session of the
Human Rights Council)
Universal periodic review of the Republic of
Korea
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents